
The Qur’an:
A Constructed Scripture Rooted in Biblical and Apocryphal Traditions”
Full Lecture: Orated by Professor Neil Hamson at the University of Birmingham, Dubai, 2024
“The Qur’an: A Constructed Scripture Rooted in Biblical and Apocryphal Traditions”
INTRODUCTION
-
Thesis: The Qur’an is not a uniquely divine text revealed in a vacuum. It is a late product of Near Eastern monotheistic synthesis, with clear borrowing from earlier religious traditions, and may not have been originally intended to become the basis of a new religion.
-
Evidence will include:
-
Biblical parallels
-
Jewish/Christian apocrypha and Midrash
-
Quranic manuscript analysis
-
Hadith and early Islamic historiography
-
Linguistic traces (Syriac, Hebrew, Aramaic)
-
Rebuttals to common defences
-
I. LINGUISTIC AND CULTURAL CONTEXT OF THE QUR’AN’S COMPOSITION
A. The Religious Melting Pot of 6th–7th Century Arabia
-
Jews and Christians lived in Mecca, Medina, Najran, and Yemen.
-
Nestorian, Ebionite, and Monophysite Christianity were widespread.
-
The Qur’an uses theological terms not native to Arabic, suggesting exposure to foreign religious lexicons:
-
Injil (Gospel) - from Greek Evangelion
-
Sakinah (Divine Presence) - Hebrew Shekhinah
-
Rahman (Merciful) - from Syriac Rachmana
-
Furqan (salvation/judgment) - from Syriac Purqana
-
II. PARALLEL TEXTS: BIBLE VS QUR’AN
A. Creation & Fall of Adam
Bible: Genesis 2 - 3
Qur’an: Chapters 2 Verses 30 - 39, 7 Verses 11 - 25, 20 Verses 115 - 123
Concept Bible Qur’an
Garden. Garden of Eden Paradise
Forbidden Tree Tree of Knowledge Tree unnamed
Tempter Serpent Iblis (Satan)
Expulsion Result of sin Result of disobedience
Observation: Names and structure altered, but core storyline identical.
B. Cain and Abel
Bible: Genesis Chapter 4 Verses 1 - 16
Qur’an: Chapter 5 Verses 27 - 31
-
Qur’an adds a crow teaching Cain to bury Abel, not found in Bible.
-
This element comes from Jewish Midrash (Tanhuma Bereshit 10).
C. Abraham Destroys Idols
Qur’an: Chapter 21 Verse 57 - 70
No such story in the Bible.
Source: Found in Genesis Rabbah 38:13 - a Jewish Midrash centuries earlier than the Qur’an.
D. Jesus Speaks from the Cradle
Qur’an: Chapter 19 Verses 29 - 33
No such story in New Testament.
Found in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas (2nd century Christian Apocrypha).
E. Seven Sleepers of Ephesus
Qur’an: Chapter 18 Verses 9 - 26 (Ashab al-Kahf)
Christian Legend, Jacob of Serugh, Syriac homilies.
III. QUR’ANIC MANUSCRIPT EVIDENCE
A. Sanaa Manuscript (1972)
-
Found in Yemen: palimpsest - lower text erased, overwritten by a later version.
-
Radiocarbon dating: 671 CE ± 30 years (possibly pre-canonical).
-
Shows verses omitted or worded differently than modern Qur’an.
-
E.g., Chapter 2 Verse 196 and 9 Verse 9 show variation in grammar and structure.
-
-
Gerd Puin: "What is found here is evidence of a scripture in flux."
B. Six Canonical Readings (Qira'at)
-
Variants: Hafs, Warsh, Qalun, Duri, etc.
-
Differences include:
-
Pronouns, verbs, and sometimes entire clauses.
-
Surah 2:184: “feeding a poor person” vs “feeding poor persons.”
-
Suggests editorial process, not divine uniformity.
IV. HADITH AND EARLY ISLAMIC SOURCES
A. Compilation Not from Prophet, but Later Caliphs
Sahih Bukhari 4987:
Zayd ibn Thabit said, “I started collecting the Qur’an from palm stalks, thin stones, and the hearts of men…”
After Prophet’s death.
Sahih Bukhari 4986:
Uthman standardized the Qur’an, burning others.
B. Lost Verses
Sahih Muslim 2286 - A verse about stoning for adultery was in the Qur’an but lost.
Umar (Caliph): “Had it not been that people would say ‘Umar added,’ I would write it.”
Suggests loss, human decisions, and editorial discretion - not divine preservation.
V. REBUTTALS TO COMMON APOLOGETIC CLAIMS
1. “The Qur’an is Miraculous in Language”
Response: Syriac homilies and Hebrew poetry often use similar structure, rhyme, and metaphor.
-
Qur’an 112 (Tawhid): stylistically similar to Syriac Psalmic poetry.
-
Many phrases are loan-translations.
2. “The Qur’an Confirms the Bible”
Response: It contradicts key tenets:
-
Denies crucifixion (Chapter 4 Verse 157)
-
Alters stories (Isaac vs Ishmael sacrifice)
-
Changes chronology
This is reinterpretation, not confirmation.
3. “Muhammad was illiterate, so couldn’t write this”
Response:
-
“Ummi” = Gentile, not necessarily illiterate. (Cf. Qur’an Chapter 2 Verse 78)
-
He may have recited texts he heard from Christians and Jews.
-
Waraqah ibn Nawfal, cousin of Khadijah, was a Christian priest who helped Muhammad.
VI. STRUCTURAL EVIDENCE: A LITURGICAL LECTIONARY?
-
Luxenberg & Puin suggest the Qur’an was originally a Christian lectionary (scripture reading guide).
-
Repeated stories, sudden interjections, and liturgical formulae indicate a compilation of sermons and hymns.
-
Surahs often open with oaths: “By the fig and the olive…” (Surah 95) — similar to Syriac monastic poetry.
VII. CONCLUSION
-
Qur’an is not original, but a composite of:
-
Jewish Midrash
-
Christian Apocrypha
-
Syriac liturgy
-
Oral storytelling
-
-
Manuscript evidence and Hadith show redaction, loss, and human compilation.
-
Theological framework appears developed post-factum, not divinely revealed as a final word.
Academic Position: The Qur’an, when stripped of theological reverence, is a Late Antique religious document, reflecting the theological and literary culture of its time - not a perfect divine revelation.
Suggested Academic Sources:
-
Christoph Luxenberg, The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Qur'an
-
Gabriel Said Reynolds, The Qur’an and the Bible
-
Gerd Puin, Observations on Early Qur’anic Manuscripts in San’a
-
John Wansbrough, Qur’anic Studies
-
François Déroche, The Qur’an and its Manuscripts
-
Patricia Crone, Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World
-
Alphonse Mingana, Syriac Influence on the Style of the Koran